HomeTechnologySpaceX Starlink: It starts in the fall, scientists are storming against satellite...

SpaceX Starlink: It starts in the fall, scientists are storming against satellite internet

Broken internet satellites will produce a lot of junk in orbit in the future. (Collage: Dotted Yeti / Shutterstock.com with material from NASA)

Remember Article

Only 1,800, then 12,000, later 55,000: the host of satellites grows and grows. However, some requirements are still missing in order to be active globally. Specialists warn of the side effects.

Starlink will be available globally from September, announced CEO Gwynne Shotwell of Elon Musk’s space company SpaceX. The President told Reuters: “We have successfully deployed around 1,800 satellites and once they are in operational orbit we will have continuous global coverage.” To supply satellite internet. Experts are critical of the mega-constellations, the first lawsuits are pending.

More satellites than stars in the firmament

Meanwhile, voices are increasing that the massive accumulation of satellites in Earth orbit want to stop. Recently, for example, there has been a lawsuit in the USA against the license issued by the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) Starlink. The licensing authority had to take the US federal environmental law Nepa (National Environment Policy Act) into account when allocating, according to the allegation. At its core it is about the impairment of the night sky. Astronomers and stargazers complain that in the foreseeable future there will be more satellites than stars in the sky. Astronomers describe the 1,800 satellites as “brighter than 99 percent of the satellites currently in orbit”. That is cause for concern. Starlink is now trying to lower the reflections. Now lawyers argue about the chances of the lawsuit.

All US authorities are supposed to use the Nepa, but there are huge exemptions. The FCC has had a categorical Nepa exclusion for almost all of its activities since 1986 – although NASA, for example, has to fulfill the obligation. There is no authority that uses such a far-reaching exclusion, say civil rights activists. Given the size of the current Starlink license for 12,000 satellites, it could be overturned in court, it is said. One expects that the FCC must at least adhere to the same rules as NASA. If all instances are fought through, the chance decreases. The Supreme Court is very conservative and has a reputation for wanting to reduce environmental regulations.

Geoengineering without supervision

Experts see another problem in the introduction of aluminum oxide into the atmosphere. Satellites usually consist of aluminum, which is converted into the ozone-depleting oxide when it burns up. A recent study by the University of British Columbia in Vancouver estimates 2.2 tons of material from dead Starlink satellites – per day. It recently appeared on Nature. Currently, three percent of the Starlink satellites are said to be junk. The oxide is also released during rocket launches. This creates temporary holes in the ozone layer, the authors write. In addition, the oxide reflects certain wavelengths and this could possibly increase the reflectivity of the planet. In order to reduce global warming, the idea used to be to lower solar radiation by adding aluminum oxide to the stratosphere. The geoengineering project was abandoned because there is not enough knowledge about the side effects. The scientists criticize that this very procedure is now being carried out as an unaccompanied experiment with an uncertain outcome.

Kessler effect threatens space travel

Not only Starlink’s planned 55,000 satellites, but also the similarly structured Amazon project “Project Kuiper” and a separate constellation of Chinese providers will pack the orbit full of satellites in the foreseeable future. This also increases the likelihood of a collision. In the worst case, a collision with space junk or spacecraft triggers Kessler syndrome: a chain collision in which more and more scattered parts damage other satellites at high speed. This year the ISS had to avoid rotating scrap parts several times. Most recently, a study by scientists at the University of Bratislava examined the harmful effects of light pollution from satellites.

t3n means:
I don’t understand why a US regulatory agency is about this can decide who will blast the orbit. It would be great to have an ultra-national organization – for example within the framework of the UN – to take care of it. The orbit is like the sea in the past: everyone can do what they want with it, there is no global control body. Unfortunately, one cannot trust the national authorities on this point, as one can see again in the USA in this case. The result at the sea: All industrial companies and countries have dumped toxic and radioactive waste in it and made even more mischief with it, which will catch up with us again at some point. Now it’s the turn of the orbit: If commercial interests do not meet any framework conditions, we will soon have to restrict our own space travel because of the littering of the orbit. It’s actually a shame, because thanks to commercial providers it is really getting going. I will still not understand why not every activity has to be tested for its climate compatibility in the face of a blatant climate crisis.
Raimund Schesswendter

You might also be interested in

Follow World Weekly News on

Tyler Hromadka
Tyler Hromadka
Tyler is working as the Author at World Weekly News. He has a love for writing and have been writing for a few years now as a free-lancer.

Leave a Reply

Must Read