coalition government decided to apply in Supreme Court (SC) for formation of a full court bench deal with interpretation cases of Article 63-A of Status related constitution of Desertion from MPs, Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb said in a statement. on Sunday.
issue was in the spotlight on The Friday when the Deputy Speaker of the Punjab Assembly Dost Mohammad Mazari decided not to consider PML-Q. votes in chief of the Punjab minister of elections, counting them against party head The instructions of Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and thus the victory of Hamza Shehbaz. over PML-Q leader Chaudhry Parvez Elahi.
Mazar’s decision was challenged by Elahi. in applied and in Saturday’s hearing at the Lahore SC register, the high court allowed Hamza to remain a “confidant” of the head of the Punjab. minister till Monday.
Main judge of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial also noted that the prima facie decision of the vice-speaker against higher court judgment in link to Article 63-A.
As Saturday’s hearings drew to a close, PML-N began publicly pressing for for a full court bench and asked the questionone-sidedness” of in decision from “special bench” of Supreme Court.
government The Alliance has officially decided move SC in concerning, information minister said today.
Leaders of in government the alliance will also speak at a press conference at 10:30 on Monday.
The leaders will then go to the highest court. with their lawyers ask for the formation of a full court bench which jointly considers cases related to elections of Chief Punjab ministerSupreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) review petition of UK opinion on Article 63-A and other related petitions.
The statement said that the PPP, PML-N and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl will move to the SC, while the Muttahid Qaumi Movement-Pakistan, the Balochistani National Party, the Balochistani Awami Party and other allied parties will also be among the applicants. .
“Lawyers of all sides will argue in Supreme Court on Article 63-A of Constitution,” the statement said.
The day before, the ruling alliance issued a statement demanding that the leader justice of Pakistan is full court to consider the application against Chief Punjab minister elections, calling them “an important national political and constitutional issue”.
The declaration stated that the Constitution drawn a clear line of power between the legislative, judicial and administrative powers, which the “arrogant, anti-constitutional and fascist” man tried to erase.
Composite sides of Decree coalition said in a statement that they won’t compromise on Constitution, democracy and law of in people to rule.
On May 17, the Supreme Court decided on presidential appeal for interpretation of Article 63-A that votes of Deserters-deserters will not be counted.
Subsequently, on June 23 SCBA filed a petition in Supreme Court on for a review of this is decision.
Full Court bench this requirement of justice’: law minister
Meanwhile, Justice Minister Azam Nazir Tarar spoke at a press conference. in Lahore with Punjab government press secretary Attaullah Tarar, calling for formation of a full court bench deal with cases related to the interpretation of section 63-A.
He said that cases like review petition or Friday’s Punjab CM elections or appeals of all PTI MPA dissident dissidents were linked to each other. “The most fundamental case is the interpretation of Section 63-A. with which all these issues are resolved,” he said. added.
Referring to Hamza, the law minister said that if the representative of in people should have been sent home through legal decision back then it was a requirement of justicetransparency and independence for a full court bench hear the matter.
He also denied the allegations of PML-N is behind recent social media trend that criticized high court judges and said that his party respected government agencies.
The CJP must decide on full court bench: Fawad
Meanwhile, senior PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry said it’s a prerogative of Main justice form full court bench.
“But CJP has already said there is no place for legal interpretation in this is more than that,” he said in a conversation with reporters. in Lahore.
He demanded to initiate a case of disqualification. against government leaders who ignored the decisions of the highest court in chief of the Punjab ministerelections.
“Deputy Speaker of the Punjab Assembly show up in The Supreme Court, despite a subpoena that shows ignoring it for court.”
He said PTI would have to think of “other ways” if PML-N tries to disrupt the trial on Monday.
SCBA President urges SC to accept up his review plea
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan President (SCBA) Ahsan Bhun called on the Supreme Court to take up his review petition against his decision in President’s note on Article 63-A.
“It’s the right time for high court to accept up pending petition of SCBA and resolve the issue for once and for all, so as not to one dares to point fingers at the highest court,” Bhun said. in statement.
He claimed that the SCBA was of the opinion that the interpretation of Article 63-A Concerning Conversion of dissidents” against norms of natural justice, therefore, it requires careful and detailed discussion.”
He also called on all political parties to refrain from issuing orders of The Supreme Court caused controversy by stating “let the court interpret the constitutional questions”.
