police personnel Stand guard during the hearing of The case of Gyanvapi Temple – Shringar Gauri Mosque, outside Varanasi District Court, Monday 23 May 2022 (PTI Photo)
Emphasis on “complexity” of Related issues in Civil Action” under consideration before the Civil Judge (Senior Chamber), Varanasi, on Gianfabe dispute ‘and they have sensitivityFriday, the Supreme Court ordered the transfer of Proceedings pending to the District Magistrate, Varanasi, for The trial and all preliminary and subsidiary proceedings. The lawsuit said,should to be tried before a senior An experienced judicial officer of Supreme Judicial Service of Uttar Pradesh”.
Reply to the argument of Chief Lawyer Hudhayfa Ahmadi – noon for The Commission of Management of Anjuman Intezamia Masjid, Varanasi – That the process initiated by the Varanasi court was in violation of the places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991 AD bench of Judges D.Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant and P.S. Narasimha, also He said that “make sure of religious character of a place It does not prevent him… the law.”
Read also:
Abinav Prakash Singh writes: At stake in Gianfabe, hopes of civilization
Ashutosh Varshni writes: Gianfabi: The court must follow Law not faith
.
