HomeWorldPakistanThe SC reserves the verdict in Mazari case

The SC reserves the verdict in Mazari case

ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court (SC) on Hearings on the decision of the Vice Speaker of the Punjab Assembly ended on Tuesday. in CM Punjab election case, ARY News reports.

The reserved solution will be announced at 17:45.

Hearing against resolution of Deputy Speaker of the Punjab Assembly in CM The electoral process continues for three days. Trinomial bench of The SC, led by the SPB, resumed hearings, here today.

At today’s hearing, the lawyer for the Deputy Speaker of the Punjab Assembly, Irfan Kadeer, and the lawyer for the PPP, Farooq H. Naek, appeared before the court. Lawyers for the PPP and Mazari informed the court about decision of boycott of their clients.

Bandial of Justice CJP in his remarks said demand of education of full the court is a delaying tactic and said that full the court will only available in in second a week of September.

He asked the parties boycotting the trial to show some kind of grace.

The CJP stated that “no legal” grounds were presented to the court; arguments were given only in relation to party head directions; the court concluded that in in current case was not need for a full bench.

Read more: Lawyers for Ch Shujaat, PPP went to trial despite boycott

CJP Bandial said that real the question was who could give directions to party legislators. The constitution clearly states that the parliamentary party will give Directions to deputies, he said.

“There is no need for further arguments in this case. We will give priority in packaging up this case as soon as possible,” he said.

Meanwhile, a higher court asked for help on question about directions party head or parliamentary party.

“Helping the court over legal issues or we set yourself away from bench” CJP Bandial told barrister Ali Zafar, counsel of Elahi.

Bringing your arguments in case, Zafar said that the petition against The 21st amendment was rejected by the ratio of 13:4 in a full court.

However, many judges gave different arguments. for rejecting the application, he added.

Zafar told the court that the constitution mentions that the parliamentary party will give directives to deputies to vote.

At the same time, the CJP asked whether party head and parliamentary party were two separate entities.

Read more: Lawyers for Ch Shujaat, PPP went to trial despite boycott

Zafar said they are two separate entities.

CJP Bandial stated that the parliamentary party can’t decision on your own. AT light of political partydirections, parliamentary party makes him decision.

After a PML-Q request counsel said that world “parliamentary party”used in Political parties order 2002.

At the same time, Judge Ahsan noted that the word “parliamentary leader” instead of “parliamentary party” is just a mistake.

Auxiliary Attorney General (AAG) Amir Rehman then took the floor and said that he wanted submit several proposals to the court.

CJP Judge Umar Ata Bandial after hearing arguments of respondents noted that of interpretation of section 63A of Constitution adopted and not need for further interpretation.

He also praised AG Punjab for his efforts of interpretation of in the article, but said his explanation was “wrong’.

Comments

Follow World Weekly News on

Derrick Santistevan
Derrick Santistevan
Derrick is the Researcher at World Weekly News. He tries to find the latest things going around in our world and share it with our readers.

Leave a Reply

Must Read