President of the Supreme Court of India Nevada Ramana on Thursday admitted that the effect of Free gifts promised by political parties on The country’s financial health was ‘serious’ issue“But he said it wasn’t in favor of Not acknowledging any party over Because that would be “anti-democratic.”
“Not recognizing and everything is an anti-democratic thing, which I don’t do like… It is a democratic country,” presided over the CJI over two judges benchhe said while hearing a plea on The issue.
“No one is saying that this is not issue. This is dangerous issue. People who They get benefits he might say this is a welfare state, and we are entitled to it. People who Opponents may say we pay taxes… and they should be spent on Developmental activities, not for distributed in whatever way concerts, said CJI.
“No one can say that this cannot be debated, or that debate cannot be started… The proposed committee can consider these issues,” he said while referring to the court’s proposal as anti-democratic. last A week about preparation up of a panel to make recommendations.
court also expressed his reservations on how So now you can go to issue. “I can’t ignore amount of discussion or exchange of Perspectives permeate in social media, newspapers, etc. The question is to what extent can we intervene? … reason Is that there is an election commission under the constitution, an independent body and political parties exist.. it is wisdom of all of these people I want He said “.
“We seriously feel that for sure issue of interest. some financial Discipline has to be there. We are actually testing it in else countries… sure, there is issue. But in country like India, there are issues of poverty, etc. We cannot ignore these issues also. the government of India offers some blueprints, state governments also enter certain schemes, like feed of people in Drought areas, sometimes in CJI said.
I’m hesitant to get involved in Issues to be decided by the legislature. You can say that I am a strict orthodox man. Me, no want To encroach on the intended areas for The legislative or executive authority…”, he said.
The center suggested, on Thursday, that the proposed committee might include a member of a national Taxpayers Association or Retired Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), Union Finance Secretary, Finance Secretary of All states, representative of all recognized national Politician partyChairman of Board of Directors of Fifteenth Finance Committee, Reserve Bank of India Representative, NITI Aayog CEO, Representative nominated by CEC Chairperson, FICCI or CII representatives and those from “stressed sectors”.
The presence of Attorney General Tushar Mehta for The government said that “distributing things for free can never be the only one way of Good.” There are always scientific methods of people’s well-being. Elected governments must follow Scientific methods… regarding welfare plans concernedAll government does and all government should an act. Now this freebie culture, distribution of Free thing, leveled up of a art Sometimes elections are only held by some departments on Mehta said.
He said, “If that is the understanding of Which political department? of Our country that distributing free gifts is the only one way of Good of The people, making the situation dangerous. we leading The country is in disaster.
Mehta urged the court to issue directione in timer until issue It is checked. The question is not just exercise of Your lordship power But your constitutional desire for lords ensure how delegation of the Constitution should is performed. Do something up to any of the legislature steps inor the Electoral Commission, or either body Your lords decide to examine it and bring it to court,” the Secretary General introduced.
“(if) government Understanding luxury of The people to be the distribution of Free stuff in a certain section… in Given set of Circumstances, there may be justification. But if that becomes the norm, then your lords may step in and put down Guidelines … scheme of care each responsible government We have to understand, but distribute everything for free and bring it to the level of a art Mehta said.
appear for The petitioner Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh referred to the court ruling of July 2013 in cases. Subramaniam Balaji vs the state of Tamil Nadu et al.” “Your previous judgment says There is a legislative vacuum, that a model cipher of Behavior can be framed, which ECI has not done for All these years, he said.
pointing out That countries have a cumulative day debt of 15 crores, parties said should Locate in Their statement where money for Promises will come from. He said the purpose cannot be obtained power despite of What happens to financial discipline?
Also representing the petitioners, Senior Advocate Arvind Dattar, who has appeared in Subramaniam Balaji’s case, background explained. DMK Promise give Color TVs for all of these who you do not have one… come to power. In the next Elections, AIADMK promised laptops, treadmills, etc… He defied it on A constitutional principle, under Article 282, money must for a public Purpose and we cited it international Provisions that say where money not spend for public Purpose, judicial courts power to stop the payment.
At the time, Datar said, “the Higher Committee said that giving free gifts is to implement the guidelines.” “give laptop Or Goldchain could not be to further the guiding principles,” adding that he did not believe the proposed committee would achieve any of them. result.
Datar said when the Supreme Court held free and fair elections to be part of it of The basic structure of Constitution, she can consider issuing directives on Free gifts too. But CJI said, “This is different issue…is limited only to the person contesting the election.” “In worry of Going to do something, we can’t commit “Fatal error,” he said.