The Supreme Court ruled that GST Council recommendations are not binding And that states can “resist the states.” of the Union using different forms of Political rivalry ‘ignited debate in Congress’ on Look for review of GST Mechanism – Or Even Claim A Cancellation of The law itself.
Division of Congressional leaders believe that party should demanded a review of Mechanism of Goods and Services Tax or its abolition of Goods and Services Tax Law in Its announcement is shivir Udaipur chintan and that it lost an opportunity by not doing so.
sources in Congress said some senior leaders, including former Union Ministers Anand Sharma, Manish Tiwari and Mani Shankar Ayar, along with AICC data analytics head Praveen Chakravarty, raised these views during intense deliberations of Led by P Chidambaram group on economic affairs during the secret meeting.
Chidambaram, the sources, it wasn’t in favor. When contacted, Chidambaram said that there are no such demands made in his presence. He did not go into details.
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that recommendations of The Goods and Services Tax (GST) council has only compelling value. While the center said that decision There is no change in already Existing frameworkSome opposition-ruled countries have stated that they will do so give them are bigger space Takes decisions in Federal structure.
The congressional proclamation issued at the end of shivir, “GST brought authoritarian and arbitrary small Medium industries are on the edge of the abyss of A catastrophe.” Talking about a “sharp deterioration” of Financial relations between the center and the state,” he said, “The Indian National Congress is of The view This is need of hour for comprehensive review of Financial relations between the center and the state and to protect and preserve rights of the states”.
During the discussions, Chakravarty learned that he had argued forcefully that state governments had lost their independent tax powers after the introduction of Goods and Services Tax and the promised economic gains remained elusive. Sources said he argued that party should demand Cancellation of Goods and Services Tax Law.
Tiwari argued hard too on Similar lines. He learned that he said the GST had “bartered” rights of States. Moreover, the union government Repeatedly on Goods and Services Tax obligations. In this lightYou know, he argued that it was time review Whether it is the same GST should Canceled.
hair like this view It must be combined in Advertising.
Sharma said the GST mechanism should are reviewed.
Sources said Chidambaram felt that abolition was a very radical idea that should be discussed and considered on a different level. in The party as it was outside authorization of The group.
Buy now | for us best Subscription plan now has special price
Meanwhile, Chakravarty tweeted on Friday that the Supreme Court had “confirmed what I had argued for Years about GST as a flawed idea for Federation of India.
When calling, Tiwari declined to comment on internal deliberations in The party But he said, “The Supreme Court ruling has reaffirmed concerns about efficacy of GST Mechanism as the Magic Bullet for India’s Economy problems”.
Upon calling, Sharma told The Indian Express that “GST needs to be review”.
In a federal state, rights of Countries must be protected… way done in In a very hasty way … flawed … I welcome the verdict. It is a historical ruling. it’s very reassuring for states because the relations between the center, the state, and the federal spirit were under strain. Countries were on the receiving end. it’s time for comprehensive review to ensure That states…sovereignty of He said that the legislatures as well as their rights are fully protected.
.
