court of Today the chief judge of Varanasi is expected to decide whether the case is brought by five Hindus women Request the right to worship inside the city is located Gianfabe Mosque next To the famous Kashi Viswanath temple, it is ‘maintainable’ or not.
Here are 10 facts from this big story
It is likely that District Judge AK Vishvesha will issue the orders on Whether it was before women – which led to a survey inside the Gianvapi Mosque – will continue to be heard or whether it will cease to have any legal status.
In May, the Supreme Court referred the case to the Varanasi District Magistrate’s Court, transferring it from a lower court where it had been heard until then.
The Supreme Court had ordered the following: “Maintain complexity and sensitivity of Subject in viewCivil lawsuit before the civil judge in You will hear Varanasi before a senior An experienced judicial officer of Judicial Service UP”.
A month before the Supreme Court intervened in In the case, the Varanasi Civil Court ordered the filming of Gianfapi Mosque, Al Qaim on Petition by Hindus women who He claims that there are idols of Hindu Gods and Goddesses in Gianfabe Mosque Complex
a report of Then the photography in the mosque was submitted to the court of Varanasi in Cover closed, but Hindu petitioners released controversial details just hours Later.
The report claimed that “Shivling” was found in A pool is used inside the mosque complex for Wazoo or ritual purification before Muslims pray. The judge who heard the case at that time had ordered the sealing of This blessing.
This photography was challenged inside a centuries-old mosque in Supreme Court by the Gianfapi Mosque Committee.
The petitioners said that the filming goes against the places of Worship Law of 1991 who maintains religious status of Which place of worship like of August 15, 1947.
“Such petitions and seals of Mosques will lead to me public “Societal harm and disharmony will affect mosques across the country,” the Mosques Committee said.
Mosque Committee made Similar Arguments before Varanasi District Judge’s Court in The case of “maintenance”, while lawyers for The Hindu petitioners claimed that the law does not preclude their case and that they could prove it in The court that the mosque buildings were in fact a temple like on today of independence.