HomeWorldPakistanImran advised to apologize over judge's remarks

Imran advised to apologize over judge’s remarks

ISLAMABAD:

Lawyers who support Pakistani Tehreek-e-Insaf called former prime minister Imran Khan apologizes unconditionally over his tirade against woman judge

However, it appears that PTI is still in contempt of court. against its chairman Imran Khan “condescendingly”.

imran, in his last address in Haripur criticized Judge Additional and Sessions Judge Zeba Chaudhry, who granted two days of detention of assistant to the former prime minister, Dr. Shahbaz Gill, to the Islamabad police.

It became known that one application will be submitted in case of disrespect material will be referred to Islamabad High Court on multi-party Statements by leaders of the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) alliance against the highest judiciary.

Just like Gill family power move a complaint for taking action against female referee before IHC inspection team take measures against her.

However, senior lawyers wonder how how complaint can be filed on the foundation of court order, which was also maintained by the IHC itself.

They say filing such a complaint would hurt PTI even more. Lawyers are disappointed on in special media campaign against female judge.

Read more: The government sends mixed signals on arrest of Imran Khan

It’s exactly the same also witnessed that PTI leaders on social media are also IHC survey for compliance with the order of the female judge, in which Gill was subjected to two more days of detention.

Several pro-PTI lawyers are suggesting that Imran issue an unconstitutional apology. for make a threatening statement against female judge.

Imran held a meeting with PTI legal department team on Wednesday. It’s not yet clear who will represent Imran in case of contempt.

Several party leaders suggest he hire a lawyer who It has good reputation in judicial branch.

IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah to resume his judicial work work from next a week.

Judgment is coming against head of PTI on charge of obstruction of administration of justice – serious issue.

Interestingly, Acting CJ IHC Aamer Farouk issued a written order on petition for disqualification of Imran on Account of non-declaration of his child.

IHC contacted counsel for in petitioner on maintainability of plea and adjourned the trial until last a week of September.

Likewise, debate also continue regardless of whether the IHC has jurisdiction to bring a contempt case against Imran in absence of petition.

Former additional attorney general Waqar Rana said apparently in section 4(2) of Contempt of Judgment 2003, high court may consider with question of contempt of the lower court, but there was no procedure regarding how he could move on to the subject.

Other senior the lawyer said that the high court could do so on the basis of on information.

“The informant is the referent. Once this is done, the case is decided between the court and the contemporary,” he said. added.

Lawyer Hafiz Ahsan Ahmad Khokhar stated that there are no limits or restrictions regarding contempt of court. of 2003 court ruling on higher courts of country of recognition of any matter relating to civil, criminal and judicial contempt.

However, he added that Section 4 (3() of Contempt of 2003 court ruling despite granting powers to higher courts in other sections take over the jurisdiction of suo moto, but expressly excluded the domain of high court.

He declared that no high court should consider in cases in what is the alleged offense of contempt was punished by a lower court under the Penal Code of Pakistan, 1860.

According to him, there was no such restriction. on the Supreme Court, insofar as it could take into consideration in all questions relating to disrespect.

More legal expert one should always respect the courts and judges as an institution.

However, in In this case, the FIR was registered on earlier declaration under the Code of Criminal Procedure, and under the Police Anti-Terrorism Act on written complaint of a government official before taking note of high court.

“The High Court has no jurisdiction in Suo Motu according to clear wording and exclusion of Section 4(3) of Contempt of Court ruling 2003”, added.

Follow World Weekly News on

Derrick Santistevan
Derrick Santistevan
Derrick is the Researcher at World Weekly News. He tries to find the latest things going around in our world and share it with our readers.

Leave a Reply

Must Read