HomeWorldPakistanIHC grants Imran bail until Thursday in terrorism case - pakistan

IHC grants Imran bail until Thursday in terrorism case – pakistan

Islamabad High Court on On Monday, PTI chief Imran Khan was released on bail until Thursday (August 25). in terrorism case filed against his for “threatens” a female judge and senior police officers in public rally.

The ex-prime minister was booked on Sunday under Section 7 of Anti-Terrorism Act (punishment for valid of terrorism) regarding his comments at a rally in Islamabad on Saturday.

Earlier today, Imran’s lawyers, Babar Awan and Faisal Chaudhry, filed a petition asking pre-arrest pledge on on his behalf in IHC.

Two bench members composed of Judges Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Judges Babar Sattar, took up petition and inquired about objections raised by the registrar office.

Avan informed the judge that an objection had been raised regarding the appeal to the relevant forum. on in plea. Judge Kajaani noted that the biometrics objection was also raised.

During the trial, Awan claimed that Imran’s residence in Banigal was “encircled” and that “he cannot even go to the proper court”. He urged the court to grant bail to Imran so that he could apply to the appropriate forum.

And if the court wants use grant their authority pre-arrest bail, this is your jurisdiction, – he added.

Judge Kajaani observed that the appropriate forum was the anti-terrorist court and ruled out possibility of IHC granting Imran pre-arrest bail at this point.

The court then approved Imran’s bail until Thursday and instructed him to apply to the appropriate court by then.

However, Avan begged with bail extension court one more day. He argued that three days was not enough.

To this Judge Kayani said: “I will appoint special judge and issue Order for approaching the relevant forum within an hour.”

Petition

Application, copy of which the available with Dawn.comstated that Imran was “a target of ruling PDM (Democratic Movement of Pakistan) for his fearless criticism and extremely bold and straightforward stance against corruption and corrupt politicians”.

“And to achieve this malware, by acting in in the most unfortunate and clumsy way, false and registered an unfounded complaint against by his Islamabad Capital Territory Police (ICT) as directed by of current government,” It added.

plea further stated that government decided to “go beyond” arrest Imran “under false accusations” and was “obsessed with sorting out in petitioner and his party at any price”.

government, in an illegal attempt to settle the political score decided to “illegally and illegally prosecute” petitionerthe message says, adding that government registered 17 FIRs against Imran.

It goes on to say that the most recent FIR against was “politically motivated” in in which Imran was “falsely” implicated with “malicious intent and ulterior motives to humiliate” him.

Furthermore, plea emphasized that the FIR was registered after “an inexplicable excessive delay”. of 24 hours”. “Content of FIR reflect that the alleged offense is not made out. A business in hand of further investigation.”

plea claimed that the case was based on “speculation and conjecture” and that there was no evidence available on record against Imran in connection with a business.

it also claimed there was no “direct or circumstantial” evidence available on record against Imran in case that raised “serious doubts in accusation story”.

It’s gone on to say that Imran was a respectable citizen and “clear fear of its inevitable arrest would cause humiliation and unjustified persecution.”

It said “there’s no chance” of Imran is hiding or falsifying with proof of the prosecution, if bail is granted.

petitioner has a flawless track record and never attracted in Any criminal activity, plea said, adding that he was ready join investigation how and when required.

The petition stated that Imran was also ready to provide a “solvent surety” when required.

The state was appointed as the defendant in in plea. However, this is not yet clear if the petition is accepted for hearing.

Spruce

Spruce against Imran was registered at Islamabad’s Margalla police station at 10:00 pm. on Saturday under complaint of Judge Ali Javed.

The FIR said that at a PTI rally in the F-9 park a day ago, Imran “terrorized and threatened senior police officials and a respected female extra-trial judge.” in his address.

The FIR reproduced the comments of the PTI chairman in which he spoke about a woman judge and police officers in Islamabad.

To his address on On Saturday, Imran threatened to sue against Inspector Islamabad general of police and deputy inspector general of police and said: “We won’t regret you.

former the prime minister had also objected to Additional District Judge and Judge of Sessions Zeba Chaudhry, who approved Gill’s two-day arrest upon request of Metropolitan Police and said that she should “prepare for action to be taken against her”.

The FIR claimed that Imran’s speech was intended to “intimidate” senior police officials and judges so that they could not perform functions and refrain from any action against any person associated with PTI, if required to do this.

The judge claimed that Imran’s speech sowed fear and uncertainty among the police, judges and the nation. “Terrorism has spread, the peace in the country has been undermined,” he said. added.

FIR demanded a lawsuit against Imran and “exemplary punishment” will be observed out.

Imran has been criticized for his remarks

Before registration of FIR, Interior Minister Rana Sanaulla stated that government provided legal advice on whether to initiate a separate case against PTI Chairman for his “provocative speech” on Saturday or designate it in previous case.

“All this is happening in continuation from campaign after the incident with Lasbela, when six army officers were tortured, after which Gill tried to incite the army ranks to leave against their high command and then Imran threatens the female judge and the cops for performance of their duties in accordance with the law, minister said.

minister It was also refuted PTI’s allegations that Gill was tortured in custody.

Formerly Sanaulla also tweeted that Imran would have to face law for “threats and insults” against the magistrate and police officers.

minister said the PTI chief would not be allowed to ” challenge court order of state, inciting rebellion”.

Meanwhile, several other leaders of the ruling alliance, including Information Minister Marrium Aurangzeb and PPP member Farhatullah Babar, also condemned Imran’s remarks against judge and police.

Follow World Weekly News on

Derrick Santistevan
Derrick Santistevan
Derrick is the Researcher at World Weekly News. He tries to find the latest things going around in our world and share it with our readers.

Leave a Reply

Must Read