Home World India

Explained: Cases against Hardik Patel What do they mean? for odds of being elected

What are the cases? against Hardik and how Could it affect his political life? Indian Express explains.

Cases have been registered against Hardik Battle

Hardik has been named as the accused in At least 30 FIRs were submitted between 2015 and 2018. Seven were recorded in 2015, Hardik’s involvement for many of criminal Crimes such as riot and sedition during agitation in Gujarat demand quota for batidar community in government Jobs and education.

agitation batidar also housing saw of FIR against Hardick for Alleged internal conflicts. For example, the flight information report has been deposited at the judge police station in mahsana in August 2015 on Complaint from Sardar Patel Group’s then Vice Chairman Prakash Patel, alleging wrongdoing of financial Forgery against Hardick.

Other cases include the 2016 FIR at Sachin Police Station in Surah according to the following prison law recovery of a mobile Phone charger, battery and a message from his pocket when he was taken to Viznagar for Hearing in court. This has been eliminated of by a Surat JMFC in 2017.

According to Hardick, currentlyHe has 23 cases against for him.

In pledge before the Gujarat High Court in 2016 while searching for relief in Regarding the cases brought against I gave him Hardik on He swears that ‘should he be granted discretionary relief’, he should continue to protest to highlight grievances of batidar community “Without indulging directly or indirectly in any activity that may amount Invitation to commit a crime criminal Prosecution.” The pledge as well added”(He) does not do or indulge in any business or activities that disturb law and order throughout the State,” and that he shall not indulge in it in Any acts or activities that “incite against public As a whole in In any way “.

Subsequent rallies and protests stemmed from Batidar’s instigation of 2015 result in FIR against Hardick in 2016, 2017, 2018, which is the point that Gujarat often used government To oppose Hardik’s pleas for satisfaction in terms of suspension of Judgment, bail or any relaxation in Warranty Terms. Most of These FIRs were related to the breach of Executive orders against Illegal assembly in violation of Section 144 of the CrPC, or for holding gatherings or public Gatherings despite the state’s refusal to grant permission for The same.

What is a file current the condition of cases against Hardik Patel?

At present, Hardik faces court action under at least 11 FIRs, pending in various Phase of Experience, with two of Trials including crime of discord – one on Flight information area detection of Crime Branch Police Station of Ahmedabad and another in Regarding the flight information provided at Amruli Police Station in Surah. The remaining cases were withdrawn by the state and abolished by the Gujarat Board of High Commissioner on by a court of competent jurisdiction, or no proceedings have been initiated.

Hardek was sentenced to two years in prison of the prison in one Case by Viznagar Court in July 2018 for Rioting and arson. The accident involves preparation on fire BJP MLA Rushikesh Patel’s office in Visnagar in 2015 during agitation. Rushikesh is now the health of the state minister.

With a pending appeal before the Gujarat High Court in this april year The process remains of Conviction until the appeal is adjudicated. Hardik tried to get a residence on Conviction of Gujarat HC to run for 2019 Lok Sabha elections, but the court refused to suspend the verdict of conviction.

Recently, two Gujarat Courts allowed government to pull issues against Hardick. one withdrawn in October 2020 in Regarding the 2017 FIR presented in Tenkara in Morbi for organization public rally without permission, and second It was allowed by Ahmedabad court in may this year in Regarding FIR 2017 in Ramol Police Station in relation to vandalism of Residence of Bharatiya Janata Corporation. At least two other cases have been adjudicated of By Vadodara Court and Surat Court respectively, for hypothetical in Procedure of Prosecution, through lack of commitment set set precedent downCrPC . provisions for Prosecution of crimes related to Section 188 of the International Patent Classification.

Gujarat HC also Canceled FIR and shipping newspaper in December 2021 in Regarding the year 2017 in Bhopal FIR presented for Run a promotion in violation of Police refused permission for The event.

Hardick plea for crush of The 2017 FIR has been filed at the Patan B Department Police Station, alleging looting and assault, is still pending before UNHCR Gujarat, as is another petition seeking to rescind of condition for In November 2017, the violation alleges of election law for Walking without permission.


In July 2016, Gujarat HC was established, while granting Hardik on bail in In a 2015 sedition case, she had the condition imposed on him remain outside border of the state of Gujarat for interval of six months of history of He was released from judicial custody and did not change the address of where he will stay for these six months without prior permission of Tennis Court. Hardek spent this time of exile in Udaipur in Rajasthan.

In January 2020, after the arrest of Chief Patidar for not showing up for trial in In the 2015 sedition case, Ahmedabad court had released on bail on The requirement that Hardik apply for court permission before leaving Gujarat. Hardik had moved Gujarat HC requesting removal of This condition but his plea which was appealed to the Supreme Court.

In June 2021, a lower court in Ahmedabad allowed Hardik to travel out of Gujarat without prior permission for interval of one yearBut in November 2021, the Supreme Committee abolished the bail requirement.

After Hardek’s conviction in 2018 for Riots and arson of Rushikesh Patel officeHe was released on bail on Provided that he does not enter the Mohsana area after the state government have indicated out that his presence in The county has established issues of law and order. While Hardik relocated Gujarat HC in pursuit of a temporary adjustment in December 2019 to be allowed to enter Mahsana, he then withdrew plea After the High Commissioner expressed his unwillingness to do so allow The plea.

Although SC . remains on conviction in The Visnagar case may mean that the conditions imposed as part of the case of Conviction may not be valid, Hardik chose not to enter the district until the Gujarat High Commissioner’s team clarifies on The specific aspect during the course of his call.

run for election for Policy facing conviction

According to the provisions of the acting of People’s Law, a convicted person may not run for election unless the conviction is suspended and Member of Parliament / Legal Aid Law, if convicted during the term of office of Hold the seat, may be disqualified from the seat after three months from the date of Conviction verdict unless the appeals court stays the conviction. In view of the Supreme Court order of September 2020 in a public Interest lawsuits where directed to make a quick decision on criminal cases against sitting or former Legislators, pending cases against Hardick remain hanging sword over chances of being elected.

In August 2021, the Supreme Court had also face it criminal cases against The MPs/Legal Aid Act cannot be withdrawn without the permission of the Supreme Court.



Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version