Home World Pakistan

‘expected mistake be admitted,” CJ IHC tells Imran.


Islamabad Supreme Court (IHC) Chief Justice Athar Minallah on Wednesday expressed his disappointment over former Written response from Prime Minister and Chief of Pakistani Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan in contempt case and ordered second reply to be introduced in seven days.

Pentacle more bench led by CJ Athar Minallah heard the case earlier today. bench were Judge Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Judge Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb, Judge Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri and Judge Babar Sattar.

During the trial, the judge said that “we read your written response” before adding that he “did not expect what was said” about the lower court judges.

“I expected that mistake made would have been admitted,” continued the judge, expressing his disappointment.

The judge stated that the courts accepted up “delicate issues” including “torture” and “enforced disappearances”. Reflection on seriousness of contempt against court, he added what judges responsible for supporting justice in serious questions “were open to criticism”, especially when Imran “asked why the court was open at midnight”.

Judge Minnallah hinted at criticism of the head of the PTI. of IHC opens at midnight during vote of No confidence brought to the table against his in National Assembly in April of this year.

“It has been open to everyone since 2018,” he countered during a hearing today.

Read IHC Suspends PEMRA Notice of Imran Ban live speeches

“For past in three years we raised issue of torture without any fear,” he said, “the leader’s political party has followersThey should think before you speak.”

Minallah confirmed that for three years the court raised questions with then the federal cabinet, but “if only they [the forme ruling party] raised their voices then.”

“If somebody of The status of Imran Khan did it?” the IHC chief judge said, criticizing the head of the PTI. for unrepentant over his words.

“Not one can affect this court or any judge,” he said. added saying that “this court must uphold civil supremacy. These [lower court] judges more more important than the Supreme Court and high courts.”

“Change will come when the constitution has the rule and the rule of the civilian population is maintained,” the judge said.

Advocate General of Islamabad (AGI) Jahangir Jadoon started to claim that PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry also these statements against court. However, Imran’s lawyer distanced himself from Fawad’s comments.

Without letting AGI speak, the court argued that “the matter is between the court and one against who has been disrespected.”

“You register cases of insurrection and terrorism,” the judge criticized and suggested “an approach should be revised.”

Subsequently, the IHC appointed senior Attorney Makhdoom Ali Khan, Munir Ah Malik and member of Pakistan Bar Council as amicus in a business.

“Please appreciate the gravity of on this matter,” CJ Minallah said, postponing the court hearing until September 8 and instructing Imran to submit another response.

Strict Security in place

When Imran entered the courtroom alone, journalists asked him if he would apologize. for his remarks, to which he replied: “I submitted my answer to the court.”

He also remarked: “I wonder why there is so much fear”, in casual conversation with in media before party Vice President Shah Mehmood Qureshi forbade the journalists from further interrogation.

Police sources confirmed that the Bomb Disposal Squad was given the task. with clearing the courtroom while everyone present was ordered to vacate the premises before Imran arrival.

PTI leader Babar Awan initially refused to leave the room.

“I will not leave the courtroom,” Avan said when Hamid Khan was stopped. outside security number personnel. However, Babar Avan and his son were eventually removed from the courtroom for unnamed in in cause list while Imran is legal team was allowed inside.

PTI leader Azam Swati and AGI together with additional attorney general as well as advocate general we also allowed to enter the courtroom.

In accordance with the protection orders issued government in morning, only lawyers on in cause list they were allowed to enter the high court after a security check, and the court was fenced off with barbed wire.

While SSP Operations, Jamil Zafar was given primary responsibility of security outside Supreme Court, three superintendents of police (IP), and nine additional and deputies of the IP provided their services in neighborhood of the court.

Read more Law on NAB tweaks “rehabilitated” public office holders, says Imran

In addition, at least a thousand junior officers and officials were posted around the IHC while the security department responsible for security in the courtroom.

protection order also stated that the Safe City cameras would be used to monitor area and that all officers and personnel posted on The ground will be unarmed, except for those who are assigned duties on the roof.

In addition, 500 short range and additional 500 long range armored vehicles were placed with tear gas projectiles. At the same time, at least 3,000 shells and policemen vehicles were placed in police lines.

Still tensions remained high in IHC after ousted Prime Minister Imran Khan on Tuesday (yesterday) replied to show-cause court notice in contempt case and offered to “take back the controversial remarks he had made against District and Sessions Judge Zeba Chaudhry during a PTI rally at F-9 Park in Islamabad earlier this month.

head of PTI in The preliminary reply stated that due to “a serious misunderstanding and misunderstanding” he misunderstood that Judge Zeba was not a judicial officer, but an executive judge exercising executive functions. on federal government directions.

replysubmitted via Imran counsel Hamid Khan regretted that wrong from the speech of the chief of PTI, it seemed that he threatened the female judge for approving the physical detention of PTI leader Shahbaz Gill.

“Even otherwise, the word ‘action’ is used in the speech did not refer to any “illegal/illegal acts” against any man rather was used for “legitimate” and “lawful action”, which is correct of every citizen of Pakistan”, reply stated.

Imran wants to be fired of allegations of terrorism

Meanwhile, Imran Khan seeks his dismissal. of terrorism charges brought against his over the same speech.

Imran Khan received a warning in case of terrorism on a complaint of Islamabad Saddar Magistrate Ali Javed for threatens an additional session of the judge of the federal capital of Zeba Chaudhry.

Read also ECP asks Imran to introduce reply in Toshakhana case on September 7

Barrister Salman Safdar and lawyer Naeem Haider Panjota appeared. on on behalf of of Imran Khan, as the head of PTI, asked the court to declare the charges unlawful.

BUT bench led by CJ IHC Athar Minallah heard the case and sent notices to the IG and DIG police, as well as the plaintiff’s magistrate and the relevant SHO, requesting a response by 8 September.


Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Exit mobile version