The District Court of Varanasi is set to pass judgment on Advantages of The famous Shringar Gauri Gyanvapi Mosque case on September 12 decision Regarding maintainability of Hindu women’s plea Seeking permission to worship Hindu deities in Gianfapi Mosque Complex.
The district judge submits decision on Whether the trial is underway in Court regarding permission to worship can be maintained and whether plea Based on on defensible reasons. After hearing the arguments from both sides, on On August 24, District Judge Ajay Krishna Vishvish booked decision of court.
So far, the mosque committee has decided that property He belongs to the Endowment Council and the matter cannot be heard in court. They argued that only the Awqaf Council had the right to hear any matter relating to the mosque.
Varanasi court to decide maintainability
The court heard the petition of five women of Hindu community who Request a court grant to worship Shringar Gauri Sthal within the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque complex. The petition was filed after a structure resembling a Shifflingwas discovered on Building of The mosque. However, the mosque committee refuted the claims of Hindu petitioners and challenged that the building was a fountain rather than a fountain. Shiffling.
Read also | Exclusive photos from the basement of Gianfabe Mosque Complex
The discovery appeared after a report on Video survey of the Gianvapi Mosque and did the same in front of Varanasi court on May 19, 2022. During the previous sessions, Abhay Nath Yadav attended for The mosque committee questioned the possibility of its maintenance of The suit has been argued about 39 of 52 points Referred in Hindu petitioners plea.
On the other hand, the file advocate Argues for The plaintiffs, Vishnu Jain, once said that merits of The case of Gianvapi – Shringar Gauri has been heard, and they will proceed to submit the report of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on trial.
Mosque side club documents from 2 mosquitoes: VISHNU JAIN
Attorney Jain, during a hearing on the case on July 4th said, “Those who They point to [Places of Worship] Law 1991 should know This if a Shiffling he is found What was a year old, the law does not apply. We will present the matter in court.”
In an exclusive chat with India today, the emergence of lawyers for The petitioners said: “We have already coincidence (arguments of Mosque Committee) as documents issued by the mosque side Not related to Gianvapi Mosque. It is related to Al-Amjiri Mosque. This is a completely separate mosque. They tried show Registration documents of Haramain together.”
Read also | ‘shivling’ protection, allow Namaz: What the Supreme Court said in The case of Jianfabe
“This recording is not like that for Gianfabe and I Mosque want to say for in order to of clarity. And the for This is our made Our written submissions and our filed documents. There is no document with Ministry of Minority Affairs that the mosque pause (Council) property. Just to get supplies of Vishnu Jain said the waqf was a totally misplaced argument.”
“If the verdict against “The Hindu petitioners will then appeal to the Allahabad High Court and the High Court,” Jain said.
Rule in The case of Gianvapi Shringar Gauri will come on Monday. dad-son The duo and Gianvapi’s lawyers Harishankar Jain and Vishnu Jain speak to India Today on Shringar Gauri case# ReporterDay (Tweet embed) picture.twitter.com/h2pfhfMF9W
– IndiaToday (@IndiaToday) September 11, 2022
Jhanvapi Mosque bag in front of the Supreme Court
It is worth mentioning that Judge D.Y. Chandrashod of Supreme court, on July 21 reported that the court will wait for the imminent decision of Varanasi District Judge on A request submitted by Anjaman Intagamia Mosque challenging the lawsuit filed by five plaintiffs seeking “darshan” In the compound of the Gianfapi Mosque. Judge Chandrashod said that if the court ruled in Valid of Anjaman Entagamia Mosque, the lawsuit by women It will “fall” organically and if they rule in favor of The plaintiff, then the caretakers can seek further judicial compensation.